<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 570 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119332</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the cancellation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit due to proven violations of regulations by the appellant agency. The decision considered unauthorized use of the license, lack of proper authorization and supervision. The cancellation was deemed to end on a specified future date, allowing the appellant to resume operations after a period of suspension.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:35:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 570 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119332</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the cancellation of the CHA license and forfeiture of the security deposit due to proven violations of regulations by the appellant agency. The decision considered unauthorized use of the license, lack of proper authorization and supervision. The cancellation was deemed to end on a specified future date, allowing the appellant to resume operations after a period of suspension.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>