<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 427 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the expenditure incurred for setting up the sugar manufacturing unit was revenue expenditure and allowed a deduction under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found unity of control and interdependence between the ferro-alloys and sugar manufacturing units, considering them part of the same business. However, the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further examination of other expenditures. Regarding the depreciation claim on certain assets, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the claim, noting the genuineness of the transaction and supporting evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:31:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 427 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the expenditure incurred for setting up the sugar manufacturing unit was revenue expenditure and allowed a deduction under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found unity of control and interdependence between the ferro-alloys and sugar manufacturing units, considering them part of the same business. However, the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further examination of other expenditures. Regarding the depreciation claim on certain assets, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the claim, noting the genuineness of the transaction and supporting evidence provided by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>