https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119314 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for restoration of appeal due to non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The appellant failed to deposit the specified amount within the given timeframe, leading to dismissal. Despite financial constraints, the appellant's delayed compliance and late restoration application were deemed negligent and unreasonable. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely adherence to legal provisions, ultimately rejecting the plea for restoration based on the appellant's failure to promptly address the pre-deposit directive. en-us Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:08:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119314 The Tribunal rejected the appellant's application for restoration of appeal due to non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. The appellant failed to deposit the specified amount within the given timeframe, leading to dismissal. Despite financial constraints, the appellant's delayed compliance and late restoration application were deemed negligent and unreasonable. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely adherence to legal provisions, ultimately rejecting the plea for restoration based on the appellant's failure to promptly address the pre-deposit directive. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119314