<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 348 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119313</link>
    <description>Accessories imported with machine tools were held not to be &quot;component parts&quot; for concessional customs duty because accessories are secondary or supplementary, whereas component parts are essential constituents of the machine. The Accessories (Condition) Rules, 1963 also did not permit assessment at the same rate as the main article, since their application required compulsory supply of the accessories with no separate charge, and that cumulative test was not met on the facts. Optional accessories shown in the catalogue did not qualify, so the refund claims failed and the challenged orders remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:06:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 348 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119313</link>
      <description>Accessories imported with machine tools were held not to be &quot;component parts&quot; for concessional customs duty because accessories are secondary or supplementary, whereas component parts are essential constituents of the machine. The Accessories (Condition) Rules, 1963 also did not permit assessment at the same rate as the main article, since their application required compulsory supply of the accessories with no separate charge, and that cumulative test was not met on the facts. Optional accessories shown in the catalogue did not qualify, so the refund claims failed and the challenged orders remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>