<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 641 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119305</link>
    <description>The judge found that the appellants were not entitled to interest on their refund claim under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act. The refund was sanctioned within three months of filing, following the Order-in-Appeal, and therefore, the appellants were not eligible for interest. The appeal for interest refund was rejected, and the operative part of the order was pronounced on 24-12-2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:45:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 641 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119305</link>
      <description>The judge found that the appellants were not entitled to interest on their refund claim under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act. The refund was sanctioned within three months of filing, following the Order-in-Appeal, and therefore, the appellants were not eligible for interest. The appeal for interest refund was rejected, and the operative part of the order was pronounced on 24-12-2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>