<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 449 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119279</link>
    <description>Statutory interest on a delayed excise refund becomes payable under section 11BB once the refund is not granted within the prescribed period after the refund application, and the explanation treats a refund order passed by the Appellate Tribunal or court as an order under section 11B(2) for this purpose. Mere pendency of the Revenue&#039;s appeal does not suspend compliance with the refund order, and in the absence of a stay, withholding interest or issuing recovery proceedings for the refunded amount is not legally permissible. The applicant was therefore entitled to interest on the refunded sum, and payment was directed forthwith.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:37:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 449 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119279</link>
      <description>Statutory interest on a delayed excise refund becomes payable under section 11BB once the refund is not granted within the prescribed period after the refund application, and the explanation treats a refund order passed by the Appellate Tribunal or court as an order under section 11B(2) for this purpose. Mere pendency of the Revenue&#039;s appeal does not suspend compliance with the refund order, and in the absence of a stay, withholding interest or issuing recovery proceedings for the refunded amount is not legally permissible. The applicant was therefore entitled to interest on the refunded sum, and payment was directed forthwith.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>