<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 443 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for dispensing with pre-deposit of duty amount and personal penalty, amounting to Rs. 7,93,320, due to the denial of exemption for sports goods under Notification No. 6/2002. The Tribunal considered the products in question, &quot;Thrillers&quot; and &quot;Climbers,&quot; as falling under the category of &quot;sports goods&quot; based on previous orders and the HSN explanatory note. Citing precedents, including a case where playing cards were classified as sports goods, the Tribunal found the appellants had a strong prima facie case on merits, warranting the unconditional allowance of the stay petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:18:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 443 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for dispensing with pre-deposit of duty amount and personal penalty, amounting to Rs. 7,93,320, due to the denial of exemption for sports goods under Notification No. 6/2002. The Tribunal considered the products in question, &quot;Thrillers&quot; and &quot;Climbers,&quot; as falling under the category of &quot;sports goods&quot; based on previous orders and the HSN explanatory note. Citing precedents, including a case where playing cards were classified as sports goods, the Tribunal found the appellants had a strong prima facie case on merits, warranting the unconditional allowance of the stay petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>