<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 433 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119257</link>
    <description>Touch screen kiosks comprising a CPU, monitor and keyboard were treated as prima facie falling within the description of &quot;computers&quot; for exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE. Classification under Heading 84.71 was not in dispute, and product literature together with purchaser certificates supported the assessee&#039;s case. The purchasers&#039; certificates were treated as creating a rebuttable presumption, while the department&#039;s contrary statements were found insufficient at the interim stage. On that material, the assessee established a prima facie case against denial of exemption, so waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 18:53:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 433 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119257</link>
      <description>Touch screen kiosks comprising a CPU, monitor and keyboard were treated as prima facie falling within the description of &quot;computers&quot; for exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE. Classification under Heading 84.71 was not in dispute, and product literature together with purchaser certificates supported the assessee&#039;s case. The purchasers&#039; certificates were treated as creating a rebuttable presumption, while the department&#039;s contrary statements were found insufficient at the interim stage. On that material, the assessee established a prima facie case against denial of exemption, so waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>