<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 347 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119235</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s valuation method for imported goods, rejecting the appellants&#039; claim of defects and substandard quality. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 10 lakhs, and the penalty of Rs. 15 lakhs was maintained. The appeal was partly allowed by reducing the redemption fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 347 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119235</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s valuation method for imported goods, rejecting the appellants&#039; claim of defects and substandard quality. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 10 lakhs, and the penalty of Rs. 15 lakhs was maintained. The appeal was partly allowed by reducing the redemption fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>