<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 344 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119230</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal overturned the confiscation and penalties imposed under the Customs Act, 1962, as the department failed to prove the goods were smuggled. The seizure of goods from Mumbai was found to be unjustified, and the onus to establish smuggling was not met. Consequently, the confiscation order was set aside, and the goods were ordered to be released immediately. The penalties imposed were also revoked, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:52:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 344 - CESTAT,  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119230</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal overturned the confiscation and penalties imposed under the Customs Act, 1962, as the department failed to prove the goods were smuggled. The seizure of goods from Mumbai was found to be unjustified, and the onus to establish smuggling was not met. Consequently, the confiscation order was set aside, and the goods were ordered to be released immediately. The penalties imposed were also revoked, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>