<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 340 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119225</link>
    <description>Rule 57H of the Central Excise Rules allows credit on inputs used in manufacture, and the credit is not contingent on the inputs physically remaining identifiable in the finished product. Inputs consumed through invisible process loss during production do not lose eligibility merely because they do not appear in the final goods. On that basis, denial of credit on the ground of invisible process loss was unsustainable, and credit under Rule 57H was allowable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:46:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 340 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119225</link>
      <description>Rule 57H of the Central Excise Rules allows credit on inputs used in manufacture, and the credit is not contingent on the inputs physically remaining identifiable in the finished product. Inputs consumed through invisible process loss during production do not lose eligibility merely because they do not appear in the final goods. On that basis, denial of credit on the ground of invisible process loss was unsustainable, and credit under Rule 57H was allowable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>