<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 339 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted an unconditional stay in the case, citing conflicting judgments on the applicability of Section 4A of the Central Excise Act for goods distributed for free without MRP printing. The appellants&#039; argument aligning with a previous decision was acknowledged, leading to the stay being allowed for further resolution by a Larger Bench to address the disputed issue promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 17:44:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 339 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted an unconditional stay in the case, citing conflicting judgments on the applicability of Section 4A of the Central Excise Act for goods distributed for free without MRP printing. The appellants&#039; argument aligning with a previous decision was acknowledged, leading to the stay being allowed for further resolution by a Larger Bench to address the disputed issue promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>