<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 327 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119208</link>
    <description>For stay and pre-deposit purposes, the assessee showed a strong prima facie case for the benefit of Notification No. 6/2002-CE because the available material did not establish that its factory had a plant for making bamboo or wood pulp. The General Manager&#039;s statement only confirmed the presence of digesters used for agro residues and long fibres, while the technical opinion from IIT, Kharagpur noted the absence of plant for wood debarking, wood chipping, chip separation or screening. On that basis, the exemption claim could not be rejected at the interim stage, and waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 327 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119208</link>
      <description>For stay and pre-deposit purposes, the assessee showed a strong prima facie case for the benefit of Notification No. 6/2002-CE because the available material did not establish that its factory had a plant for making bamboo or wood pulp. The General Manager&#039;s statement only confirmed the presence of digesters used for agro residues and long fibres, while the technical opinion from IIT, Kharagpur noted the absence of plant for wood debarking, wood chipping, chip separation or screening. On that basis, the exemption claim could not be rejected at the interim stage, and waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>