https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119203 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand of Customs duty and penalties on the appellant company and employees for a shortage of gold in their SEZ unit. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the officers' actions, noting that the gold jewelry in question was likely in a second safe inaccessible to the officers during verification. As a result, the allegation of clandestine removal was dismissed, leading to the reversal of duty confirmation and penalties. The appeals were allowed with any consequential relief granted. en-us Mon, 05 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:41:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119203 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming the demand of Customs duty and penalties on the appellant company and employees for a shortage of gold in their SEZ unit. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the officers' actions, noting that the gold jewelry in question was likely in a second safe inaccessible to the officers during verification. As a result, the allegation of clandestine removal was dismissed, leading to the reversal of duty confirmation and penalties. The appeals were allowed with any consequential relief granted. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 05 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119203