<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 350 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119197</link>
    <description>The CEGAT allowed the appeals of the assessee, directing the refund of Rs. 1,35,618 to the appellants instead of depositing it in the Consumer Welfare Fund. The rejection of the refund claim without a proper show cause notice led to a remand for a thorough examination on merits by the Original authority. The judgment emphasized the importance of addressing unjust enrichment issues and ensuring compliance with legal procedures for a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:20:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 350 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119197</link>
      <description>The CEGAT allowed the appeals of the assessee, directing the refund of Rs. 1,35,618 to the appellants instead of depositing it in the Consumer Welfare Fund. The rejection of the refund claim without a proper show cause notice led to a remand for a thorough examination on merits by the Original authority. The judgment emphasized the importance of addressing unjust enrichment issues and ensuring compliance with legal procedures for a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>