<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 587 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119187</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the assessee, ruling that interest income from bank deposits, reversal of excess provisions, sales tax refund, and resale value of the Special Import License do not qualify for deduction under section 10B. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of direct nexus between these incomes and the export business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 09:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 587 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119187</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the assessee, ruling that interest income from bank deposits, reversal of excess provisions, sales tax refund, and resale value of the Special Import License do not qualify for deduction under section 10B. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of direct nexus between these incomes and the export business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>