<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 338 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119182</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellants in a dispute regarding the import of components for manufacturing Pagers under the DEEC Scheme. The Tribunal found that the appellants had fulfilled their export obligations and utilized the imported materials, allowing for industry-standard wastage due to technological advancements. As the confiscated goods did not exceed permitted wastage, the Tribunal set aside the confiscation and penalty, emphasizing the need for realistic assessments of compliance in rapidly evolving industries. The decision clarified the interpretation of Notification conditions and exporter obligations under the DEEC Scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:02:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 338 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119182</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellants in a dispute regarding the import of components for manufacturing Pagers under the DEEC Scheme. The Tribunal found that the appellants had fulfilled their export obligations and utilized the imported materials, allowing for industry-standard wastage due to technological advancements. As the confiscated goods did not exceed permitted wastage, the Tribunal set aside the confiscation and penalty, emphasizing the need for realistic assessments of compliance in rapidly evolving industries. The decision clarified the interpretation of Notification conditions and exporter obligations under the DEEC Scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>