<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 375 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119142</link>
    <description>Captively consumed intermediate goods were treated as eligible for exemption for the dispute period ending before Notification No. 16/97-C.E. dated 13-12-1997 took effect. Because the demand related to lay flat tubes used in manufacturing prior to that amendment, the later change in exemption position could not be relied on to deny relief for the earlier period. On that basis, pre-deposit of duty and equal penalty was waived and the stay petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 13:01:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 375 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119142</link>
      <description>Captively consumed intermediate goods were treated as eligible for exemption for the dispute period ending before Notification No. 16/97-C.E. dated 13-12-1997 took effect. Because the demand related to lay flat tubes used in manufacturing prior to that amendment, the later change in exemption position could not be relied on to deny relief for the earlier period. On that basis, pre-deposit of duty and equal penalty was waived and the stay petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>