<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 370 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119136</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction under the Customs Act is confined to the officer&#039;s notified area; maritime-zone deeming provisions do not extend a State customs formation&#039;s district jurisdiction into non-designated Exclusive Economic Zone locations. Seizure, show cause proceedings and adjudication outside that jurisdiction are void. A rig once assessed and cleared for home consumption ceases to be imported goods and, when treated as a vessel, does not incur fresh duty, manifest or entry obligations on subsequent cargo-free movements, including re-entry after foreign repairs. Relaxed transfer restrictions and licensing permission defeated the alleged sale-condition breach. Consequently, confiscation, redemption fine, duty demands and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:29:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 370 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119136</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction under the Customs Act is confined to the officer&#039;s notified area; maritime-zone deeming provisions do not extend a State customs formation&#039;s district jurisdiction into non-designated Exclusive Economic Zone locations. Seizure, show cause proceedings and adjudication outside that jurisdiction are void. A rig once assessed and cleared for home consumption ceases to be imported goods and, when treated as a vessel, does not incur fresh duty, manifest or entry obligations on subsequent cargo-free movements, including re-entry after foreign repairs. Relaxed transfer restrictions and licensing permission defeated the alleged sale-condition breach. Consequently, confiscation, redemption fine, duty demands and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>