<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 368 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to grant a refund of duty paid on imported defective goods that were re-exported and not cleared for home consumption. The Tribunal determined that the duty paid on non-existent goods was refundable as it did not qualify as duty under the Customs Act. It emphasized that duty liability does not arise for goods that were re-exported and that the appellant should not be penalized for paying duty on such goods. The Tribunal dismissed concerns regarding duty drawback, stating it did not apply in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:21:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 368 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to grant a refund of duty paid on imported defective goods that were re-exported and not cleared for home consumption. The Tribunal determined that the duty paid on non-existent goods was refundable as it did not qualify as duty under the Customs Act. It emphasized that duty liability does not arise for goods that were re-exported and that the appellant should not be penalized for paying duty on such goods. The Tribunal dismissed concerns regarding duty drawback, stating it did not apply in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>