<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 615 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119124</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessment of rental income in the hands of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), validated the reopening of assessment under section 148, and dismissed claims of physical division and double taxation. It emphasized that the family arrangement did not meet the legal requirements for partition recognition under section 171, thus affirming the assessability of rental income in the HUF&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:49:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 615 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119124</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessment of rental income in the hands of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), validated the reopening of assessment under section 148, and dismissed claims of physical division and double taxation. It emphasized that the family arrangement did not meet the legal requirements for partition recognition under section 171, thus affirming the assessability of rental income in the HUF&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>