<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 590 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving a claim for interest on delayed payment of abatement amount under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal held that interest should be granted as it is a refund of duty, even in cases related to refunds under the compounded levy scheme. The impugned order was overturned, and the revenue was directed to pay interest for the delay in refunding the abatement amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:40:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 590 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving a claim for interest on delayed payment of abatement amount under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal held that interest should be granted as it is a refund of duty, even in cases related to refunds under the compounded levy scheme. The impugned order was overturned, and the revenue was directed to pay interest for the delay in refunding the abatement amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>