<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 585 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the redemption fine and penalty while upholding the confiscation of the imported goods due to insufficient evidence supporting the claim of new vehicles dispatched from Germany under the EPCG scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 585 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, modifying the redemption fine and penalty while upholding the confiscation of the imported goods due to insufficient evidence supporting the claim of new vehicles dispatched from Germany under the EPCG scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>