<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 583 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119103</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the exclusion of freight and insurance charges, as well as inspection charges, from the assessable value based on legal precedents cited. The demands related to these charges were set aside. However, loading charges were confirmed as part of the assessable value, and a penalty was imposed for not including them. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with any consequential relief granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:33:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 583 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119103</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the exclusion of freight and insurance charges, as well as inspection charges, from the assessable value based on legal precedents cited. The demands related to these charges were set aside. However, loading charges were confirmed as part of the assessable value, and a penalty was imposed for not including them. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with any consequential relief granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>