<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 574 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119089</link>
    <description>Duty demand on the quantity allegedly cleared was unsustainable where the disputed quantity was attributable to meter jumping and duty had already been paid on the entire quantity received. On that factual basis, the related demand could not be maintained, and the consequential interest and penalty also failed with it. The impugned orders were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 18:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 574 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119089</link>
      <description>Duty demand on the quantity allegedly cleared was unsustainable where the disputed quantity was attributable to meter jumping and duty had already been paid on the entire quantity received. On that factual basis, the related demand could not be maintained, and the consequential interest and penalty also failed with it. The impugned orders were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>