<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 538 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119073</link>
    <description>Capital goods used by a job worker in manufacturing goods cleared without payment of duty remained eligible for Cenvat credit where duty was ultimately discharged by the principal manufacturer. The Tribunal applied its earlier line of authority treating job-work clearance as part of the integrated manufacture of the final dutiable product, and extended the same reasoning to capital goods. On that basis, the denial of credit was not sustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 18:11:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 538 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119073</link>
      <description>Capital goods used by a job worker in manufacturing goods cleared without payment of duty remained eligible for Cenvat credit where duty was ultimately discharged by the principal manufacturer. The Tribunal applied its earlier line of authority treating job-work clearance as part of the integrated manufacture of the final dutiable product, and extended the same reasoning to capital goods. On that basis, the denial of credit was not sustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>