https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119070 For duty demand under the compounded levy scheme, the Tribunal refused full waiver of pre-deposit because the alleged reduction in furnace capacity was not properly intimated and the effective date of the change could not be established on the record. The appellants' plea of financial hardship was noted, including that the unit had become defunct and sick, but the company's economic position on the relevant date was not shown sufficiently to justify complete waiver. Partial relief was granted by directing pre-deposit of 25% of the duty demanded. en-us Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:59:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119070 For duty demand under the compounded levy scheme, the Tribunal refused full waiver of pre-deposit because the alleged reduction in furnace capacity was not properly intimated and the effective date of the change could not be established on the record. The appellants' plea of financial hardship was noted, including that the unit had become defunct and sick, but the company's economic position on the relevant date was not shown sufficiently to justify complete waiver. Partial relief was granted by directing pre-deposit of 25% of the duty demanded. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119070