<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 530 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119047</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that payments for imported software do not constitute royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Act, as they are characterized as purchase and sale of goods. With no permanent establishment in India, no income accrues in India, rendering section 195 inapplicable. The Tribunal set aside the order under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A), allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 530 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119047</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that payments for imported software do not constitute royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Act, as they are characterized as purchase and sale of goods. With no permanent establishment in India, no income accrues in India, rendering section 195 inapplicable. The Tribunal set aside the order under section 201(1) and interest under section 201(1A), allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>