<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 529 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119045</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that payments made by the tenant for maintenance and other charges should not be considered as rent received by the appellant. The Assessing Officer&#039;s calculation of the property&#039;s annual value was deemed incorrect. As a result, the alternative claim for deductions under Section 57 was not addressed. The appellant succeeded on the main grounds raised in both appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 15:59:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 529 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119045</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that payments made by the tenant for maintenance and other charges should not be considered as rent received by the appellant. The Assessing Officer&#039;s calculation of the property&#039;s annual value was deemed incorrect. As a result, the alternative claim for deductions under Section 57 was not addressed. The appellant succeeded on the main grounds raised in both appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>