<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 511 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119036</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the charges of smuggling against the appellant, supported by substantial evidence and credible statements. The issuance of the second Show Cause Notice was validated, and the penalties were adjusted to be proportionate to the value of the seized goods. The detailed analysis of the statements and evidence led to a reasoned modification of the penalties imposed on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 15:52:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 511 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119036</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the charges of smuggling against the appellant, supported by substantial evidence and credible statements. The issuance of the second Show Cause Notice was validated, and the penalties were adjusted to be proportionate to the value of the seized goods. The detailed analysis of the statements and evidence led to a reasoned modification of the penalties imposed on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>