<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 581 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deletion of the addition of bonus, allowing the deduction only for the portion related to employees present during the accounting year. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deductibility of most garden maintenance expenses, except for the portion related to the construction of a mandapam, as they were deemed necessary for the business requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 15:45:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 581 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the deletion of the addition of bonus, allowing the deduction only for the portion related to employees present during the accounting year. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deductibility of most garden maintenance expenses, except for the portion related to the construction of a mandapam, as they were deemed necessary for the business requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>