<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 509 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119033</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in a case involving mis-declaration of imported goods. Despite finding no evidence of intentional misdeclaration, the appellant was criticized for inaccurate declaration. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 1 lakh and the penalty to Rs. 25,000, considering the appellant had already paid the enhanced duty. This decision aimed to balance leniency with the necessity of accurate declaration of imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 15:46:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 509 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119033</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal in a case involving mis-declaration of imported goods. Despite finding no evidence of intentional misdeclaration, the appellant was criticized for inaccurate declaration. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 1 lakh and the penalty to Rs. 25,000, considering the appellant had already paid the enhanced duty. This decision aimed to balance leniency with the necessity of accurate declaration of imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>