<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 496 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119014</link>
    <description>Excise duty on capital goods cleared as waste and scrap must be assessed only under the tariff applicable to waste and scrap, not under headings meant for new capital goods; a demand founded on incorrect classification was therefore unsustainable. Where disposal of scrap was open, reflected in accounts, and there was no suppression of facts or material showing intent to evade duty, the extended limitation period and penalty could not be invoked. The duty demand and penalty were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 14:24:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 496 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119014</link>
      <description>Excise duty on capital goods cleared as waste and scrap must be assessed only under the tariff applicable to waste and scrap, not under headings meant for new capital goods; a demand founded on incorrect classification was therefore unsustainable. Where disposal of scrap was open, reflected in accounts, and there was no suppression of facts or material showing intent to evade duty, the extended limitation period and penalty could not be invoked. The duty demand and penalty were set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>