<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 490 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant company, granting an Interim Order of stay of recovery and disposing of the Miscellaneous Application for early hearing. The judgment emphasized the prohibition of coercive recovery actions by Revenue Authorities during the pendency of Stay Petitions, in line with legal precedents and circulars cited by the appellant&#039;s consultant. The Tribunal underscored the importance of adhering to established legal principles in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:37:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 490 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant company, granting an Interim Order of stay of recovery and disposing of the Miscellaneous Application for early hearing. The judgment emphasized the prohibition of coercive recovery actions by Revenue Authorities during the pendency of Stay Petitions, in line with legal precedents and circulars cited by the appellant&#039;s consultant. The Tribunal underscored the importance of adhering to established legal principles in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>