<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 489 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119006</link>
    <description>Balance Cenvat credit on capital goods is available only if the goods remain in the possession and use of the same manufacturer in the relevant factory. Where capital goods are transferred out before the deferred credit is claimed, the statutory condition is not met and the remaining credit is not admissible. For goods removed in a later financial year, proportionate credit may be allowable where the condition was satisfied for part of the period before removal. An amended credit rule effective from 1-3-2002 also enlarged entitlement by permitting full credit for capital goods cleared as such in the same financial year, so later removals fell within the beneficial proviso.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:34:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=156003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 489 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119006</link>
      <description>Balance Cenvat credit on capital goods is available only if the goods remain in the possession and use of the same manufacturer in the relevant factory. Where capital goods are transferred out before the deferred credit is claimed, the statutory condition is not met and the remaining credit is not admissible. For goods removed in a later financial year, proportionate credit may be allowable where the condition was satisfied for part of the period before removal. An amended credit rule effective from 1-3-2002 also enlarged entitlement by permitting full credit for capital goods cleared as such in the same financial year, so later removals fell within the beneficial proviso.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>