<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 485 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119002</link>
    <description>Waiver of the remaining pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted for hearing the appeal because the amount already deposited was considered sufficient on the facts. The dispute concerned clearances by a 100% Export Oriented Unit into the Domestic Tariff Area, with the applicant relying on the valuation framework under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, Customs valuation principles for imported goods, comparable import prices, a Board circular, and financial hardship arising from closure of the unit. On that material, the Tribunal treated the existing deposit as adequate for admission of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:22:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 485 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119002</link>
      <description>Waiver of the remaining pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted for hearing the appeal because the amount already deposited was considered sufficient on the facts. The dispute concerned clearances by a 100% Export Oriented Unit into the Domestic Tariff Area, with the applicant relying on the valuation framework under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, Customs valuation principles for imported goods, comparable import prices, a Board circular, and financial hardship arising from closure of the unit. On that material, the Tribunal treated the existing deposit as adequate for admission of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>