https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119000 The Tribunal set aside the rejection of the appeal due to delay in filing, emphasizing that the Commissioner wrongly assumed the adjudication order was received on the same day issued. The appellant's eligibility for project import benefit was disputed, with the Tribunal noting the submission of a reconciliation statement as crucial. The case was remanded to the lower authority for re-evaluation, considering the new information provided. en-us Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:19:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119000 The Tribunal set aside the rejection of the appeal due to delay in filing, emphasizing that the Commissioner wrongly assumed the adjudication order was received on the same day issued. The appellant's eligibility for project import benefit was disputed, with the Tribunal noting the submission of a reconciliation statement as crucial. The case was remanded to the lower authority for re-evaluation, considering the new information provided. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 06 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=119000