https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118997 The Settlement Commission allowed the applicant's case to proceed, affirming jurisdiction in DEPB/DEEC/EPCG cases despite Revenue objections. The applicant admitted duty liability under the Customs Act, with discrepancies in duty calculation. The Commission referenced past decisions supporting its jurisdiction, recommending a review of Circular No. 53/2002-Cus for clarity. Instructions were advised to be issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs. The applicant was directed to deposit admitted duty liability within 30 days, emphasizing fulfillment of admission conditions under Section 127B of the Act. en-us Thu, 05 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:10:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118997 The Settlement Commission allowed the applicant's case to proceed, affirming jurisdiction in DEPB/DEEC/EPCG cases despite Revenue objections. The applicant admitted duty liability under the Customs Act, with discrepancies in duty calculation. The Commission referenced past decisions supporting its jurisdiction, recommending a review of Circular No. 53/2002-Cus for clarity. Instructions were advised to be issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs. The applicant was directed to deposit admitted duty liability within 30 days, emphasizing fulfillment of admission conditions under Section 127B of the Act. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 05 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118997