https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118993 A person who financed an import and retained custody of the goods lacked locus standi to seek waiver of pre-deposit and stay against a penalty imposed on the importer, because the impugned order fastened no liability on that applicant. The challenge was directed to another party's penalty under the Customs Act, so the applicant could not maintain the request on its own behalf. The application was therefore held not maintainable for want of standing and was dismissed. en-us Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jul 2012 13:05:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118993 A person who financed an import and retained custody of the goods lacked locus standi to seek waiver of pre-deposit and stay against a penalty imposed on the importer, because the impugned order fastened no liability on that applicant. The challenge was directed to another party's penalty under the Customs Act, so the applicant could not maintain the request on its own behalf. The application was therefore held not maintainable for want of standing and was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118993