<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 479 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118974</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeal, citing the conflicting decisions of different High Courts and the Supreme Court. The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to allow the credit of input duty on LDO, emphasizing that the reversal of credit should only occur when inputs are utilized in manufacturing finished goods, as per the prevailing legal precedents and the circular issued by the department in response to the Supreme Court decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 11:58:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 479 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118974</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the department&#039;s appeal, citing the conflicting decisions of different High Courts and the Supreme Court. The Tribunal upheld the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to allow the credit of input duty on LDO, emphasizing that the reversal of credit should only occur when inputs are utilized in manufacturing finished goods, as per the prevailing legal precedents and the circular issued by the department in response to the Supreme Court decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>