<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 583 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118963</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under Section 54 of the Income-tax Act for Long-Term Capital Gain reinvested in a new residential property. Despite separate agreements for purchase and sale, the property was considered a single residential unit. The temporary commercial use of a part of the property did not disqualify it from the residential exemption. The Tribunal upheld the decision to grant the deduction and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 11:04:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 583 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118963</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under Section 54 of the Income-tax Act for Long-Term Capital Gain reinvested in a new residential property. Despite separate agreements for purchase and sale, the property was considered a single residential unit. The temporary commercial use of a part of the property did not disqualify it from the residential exemption. The Tribunal upheld the decision to grant the deduction and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>