<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 419 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118944</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the invoice omitted the original manufacturer&#039;s Central Excise registration number, where the document otherwise contained the essential duty-paying particulars and the receipt, consumption and duty payment on the inputs were not in dispute. Rule 57G, as amended by Notification No. 7/99-C.E. (N.T.), permits credit despite incomplete documentation if core details of duty payment and the goods are available, and the departmental circular directed that condonable defects be handled accordingly. The invoice defect was treated as a minor procedural error, and credit was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 419 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118944</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the invoice omitted the original manufacturer&#039;s Central Excise registration number, where the document otherwise contained the essential duty-paying particulars and the receipt, consumption and duty payment on the inputs were not in dispute. Rule 57G, as amended by Notification No. 7/99-C.E. (N.T.), permits credit despite incomplete documentation if core details of duty payment and the goods are available, and the departmental circular directed that condonable defects be handled accordingly. The invoice defect was treated as a minor procedural error, and credit was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>