<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 466 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118941</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals in a case involving misdeclaration of goods for availing a higher drawback. The appellants declared a price of Rs. 97 per Kg for Heat Resistant Rubber Tension Tap, while customs authorities found the actual market price to be Rs. 15 per Kg. Despite the appellants&#039; arguments based on Customs Laboratory tests, the Tribunal relied on market inquiry and import documents to conclude that the declared value was unsupported by evidence and inflated. The discrepancies in declared values and reliance on external sources led to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 18:01:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 466 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118941</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeals in a case involving misdeclaration of goods for availing a higher drawback. The appellants declared a price of Rs. 97 per Kg for Heat Resistant Rubber Tension Tap, while customs authorities found the actual market price to be Rs. 15 per Kg. Despite the appellants&#039; arguments based on Customs Laboratory tests, the Tribunal relied on market inquiry and import documents to conclude that the declared value was unsupported by evidence and inflated. The discrepancies in declared values and reliance on external sources led to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>