<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 400 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118917</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the modification application for a Stay Order, requiring a pre-deposit of Rs. 25.00 lakhs out of a total demand of Rs. 1,22,46,357, based on the lack of a strong prima facie case. The Tribunal rejected the applicant&#039;s request to modify the order based on the Finance Bill, noting the duty demand was confirmed earlier, and the applicant had the option to pay before the Finance Bill introduction. The Tribunal granted an additional four weeks for compliance, warning of appeal dismissal for non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 16:59:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 400 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118917</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the modification application for a Stay Order, requiring a pre-deposit of Rs. 25.00 lakhs out of a total demand of Rs. 1,22,46,357, based on the lack of a strong prima facie case. The Tribunal rejected the applicant&#039;s request to modify the order based on the Finance Bill, noting the duty demand was confirmed earlier, and the applicant had the option to pay before the Finance Bill introduction. The Tribunal granted an additional four weeks for compliance, warning of appeal dismissal for non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>