https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118904 The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the Revenue's appeal regarding duty demand on alleged clandestine removal by the appellants. The appellants argued lack of evidence and highlighted their eligibility for Modvat credit, supported by documentation. Despite allegations of clandestine removal, the lack of corroborative evidence led to the establishment of a prima facie case for waiving the duty pre-deposit. Consequently, the application for stay was granted, and duty recovery was stayed pending appeal disposal. en-us Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:57:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118904 The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the Revenue's appeal regarding duty demand on alleged clandestine removal by the appellants. The appellants argued lack of evidence and highlighted their eligibility for Modvat credit, supported by documentation. Despite allegations of clandestine removal, the lack of corroborative evidence led to the establishment of a prima facie case for waiving the duty pre-deposit. Consequently, the application for stay was granted, and duty recovery was stayed pending appeal disposal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118904