<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 467 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118885</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order, affirming that the debit made by the appellants in RG-23B Part-II was proper and discharged their liabilities regarding the rescission of benefits under the money credit scheme and mode of duty payment. The tribunal found in favor of the appellants based on relevant case law, eliminating the need to remand the case for a fresh decision by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:44:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 467 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118885</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order, affirming that the debit made by the appellants in RG-23B Part-II was proper and discharged their liabilities regarding the rescission of benefits under the money credit scheme and mode of duty payment. The tribunal found in favor of the appellants based on relevant case law, eliminating the need to remand the case for a fresh decision by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>