<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 460 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118876</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, waiving pre-deposit and stay of recovery for a penalty imposed on them. The lower authorities incorrectly placed the burden on the appellant to prove legal importation of goods not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act. The appellant showed a strong prima facie case against the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:24:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 460 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118876</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellant, waiving pre-deposit and stay of recovery for a penalty imposed on them. The lower authorities incorrectly placed the burden on the appellant to prove legal importation of goods not notified under Section 123 of the Customs Act. The appellant showed a strong prima facie case against the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>