<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 574 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118874</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the employer cannot be declared in default for believing conveyance allowance is not taxable. Consequently, the interest under section 201(1A) and the deficit tax demand were not upheld. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:19:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 574 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118874</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the employer cannot be declared in default for believing conveyance allowance is not taxable. Consequently, the interest under section 201(1A) and the deficit tax demand were not upheld. The assessee&#039;s appeals were allowed, and the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>