<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 452 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118866</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata upheld the Commissioner (Appeal) order regarding stock verification and confiscation of goods. The Tribunal affirmed that excess stock did not indicate clandestine removal and reduced the penalty to Rs. 500 for unaccounted goods. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found no justification to overturn the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 13:28:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 452 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118866</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata upheld the Commissioner (Appeal) order regarding stock verification and confiscation of goods. The Tribunal affirmed that excess stock did not indicate clandestine removal and reduced the penalty to Rs. 500 for unaccounted goods. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found no justification to overturn the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>