<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 450 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118863</link>
    <description>Prima facie entitlement to use Cenvat credit for payment of central excise duty on clearance of final products supported modification of the earlier pre-deposit order. The Tribunal noted that the relevant precedent had not been placed before the Bench when the original direction was made, and that the appellant had already deposited part of the amount while pleading difficulty in paying the balance. In those circumstances, it waived any further pre-deposit and directed the appeal to be listed for regular hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 13:23:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=155860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 450 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118863</link>
      <description>Prima facie entitlement to use Cenvat credit for payment of central excise duty on clearance of final products supported modification of the earlier pre-deposit order. The Tribunal noted that the relevant precedent had not been placed before the Bench when the original direction was made, and that the appellant had already deposited part of the amount while pleading difficulty in paying the balance. In those circumstances, it waived any further pre-deposit and directed the appeal to be listed for regular hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=118863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>